Project icon: lavishly furnished initial letter with a painting of Ptolemy using an astrolab.

Ptolemaeus Arabus et Latinus

_ (the underscore) is the placeholder for exactly one character.
% (the percent sign) is the placeholder for no, one or more than one character.
%% (two percent signs) is the placeholder for no, one or more than one character, but not for blank space (so that a search ends at word boundaries).

At the beginning and at the end, these placeholders are superfluous.

Work C.2.25

Pseudo-Porphyry
Introduction to the Tetrabiblos

Εἰσαγωγὴ εἰς τὴν Ἀποτελεσματικὴν τοῦ Πτολεμαίου (‘Introduction to Ptolemy’s Apotelesmata’) consistently attributed to Porphyry (late third century A.D.) in the c. 30 extant manuscripts and in the two Latin translations. The attribution to Porphyry has generally been accepted in modern literature, but László demonstrated that most of the text at least cannot be by him. The text consists of a general introduction to astrology more than an introduction to the Tetrabiblos.

Bibl.

F. Boll, ‘Studien über Claudius Ptolemäus. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie und Astrologie’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie, Suppl. 21 (1894), 49-244: 112-118; C.-E. Ruelle, ‘Texte astrologique attribué à Démophile et rendu à Porphyre: historique de la question’, Revue des Etudes Grecques 24 (1911), 334-336; F. Cumont, ‘Antiochos d’Athènes et Porphyre’, Annuaire de l’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientale 2 (1934), 135-156; W. Gundel, H. G. Gundel, Astrologumena. Die astrologische Literatur in der Antike und ihre Geschichte, Wiesbaden, 1966, 213-215; D. Pingree, ‘Antiochus and Rhetorius’, Classical Philology 72 (1977), 203-223; D. Pingree, The Yavanajātaka of Sphujidhvaja, Cambridge (Mass.)-London, 1978, II, 438; D. Pingree, ‘From Alexandria to Baghdād to Byzantium. The Transmission of Astrology’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 8 (2001), 3-37: 7-8; S. Heilen, Hadriani genitura – Die astrologischen Fragmente des Antigonos von Nikaia, Berlin-Boston, 2015, I, 24-27; D. Greenbaum, The Daimon in Hellenistic Astrology. Origins and Influence, Leiden, 2016, 266-275; L. László, ‘Revisiting the Authenticity of Porphyry’s Introduction to Ptolemy’s Apotelesmatics’, Classical Philology 116 (2021), 392-411.

Ed.

The editio princeps of the Greek text was published by Hieronymus Wolf in Basel in 1559, together with his Latin translation (see C.2.25.1). Critical edition by E. Boer, S. Weinstock, ‘Porphyrii philosophi Introductio in Tetrabiblum Ptolemaei’, in Catalogus Codicum Astrologorum Graecorum, V.4, Brussels, 1940, 185-228. English translation of this critical edition by J. Holden, Porphyry the Philosopher: Introduction to Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos and Serapio of Alexandria: Astrological Definitions, Tempe (Ar), 2009.