Leipzig, Universitätsbibliothek, 1491
s. XV.
Or.:Germany (recipes in German f. 142r-143v).
Paper, 301 f., several hands. A folio is missing between f. 140 and 141 and one or several folia are missing after f. 141v (see below).
Astrology: Raymundus Lullus, Tractatus novus de astronomia (2r-81r); Raymundus Lullus, Ars compendiosa (86r-92v); ‘Diffinitur autem aliud (?) secundum duas partes sive species ipsius breviter ac contemplativam scilicet et activam que sunt astrologia et astronomia…’ (98r-98v); Ptolemaica (99r-99v and 100r); Albumasar, Flores (100v-115v); Hermann of Carinthia, Liber imbrium (115v-120v); Ptolemaica (124ra-141vb); recipes in German (142r-143v); Leopold of Austria, De astrorum scientia (144r-300v). Blank: 1 (except a horoscope with geomantic figures f. 1r), 81v-85v, 93-97, 121-123, 301.
Bibl. P. O. Kristeller, Iter Italicum, III, London-Leiden, 1983, 420; M. Markowski, Astronomica et astrologica Cracoviensia ante annum 1550, Firenze, 1990, 314; R. Lemay, Le Kitāb aṯ-Ṯamara (Liber fructus, Centiloquium) d’Abū Jaʿfar Aḥmad ibn Yūsuf [Ps.-Ptolémée], 1999 [unpublished], I, 344-345.
|
124ra–141vb, 99r–99v, 100r
|
‘Mundanorum ad hoc et ad illud mutacio corporum celestium… Scientia stellarum ex te et illis est. Astrologus non debet dicere rem specialiter sed universaliter… (124rb) Quod dixit Ptolomeus, ex te et illis, significat quod qui res futuras prenoscere desiderat — (141va) quanto melius quivimus exposuimus. Ptolomeus in hoc loco tricas et tricarum nomina posuit… (141vb) Stelle cum caudis sunt 9… ad modum argenti (100r) purissimi quod non potest — in regibus et divitibus apparebit. Et hec de cometis breviter distinximus. Nunc de conceptus et nativitatis hora dicendum est. Dixerunt Ptholomeus et Hermes quod Lune locus in hora qua — et hoc expertus fuit multotiens. Sic faciunt ascendentem secundum herum uranicum.’ = Abuiafar Hamet filius Joseph, 〈Commentum in Centiloquium〉 (‘Mundanorum’ version) (C.3.1.3)
. The lost folio between f. 140 and 141 contained v. 90-96 and another hand supplied the missing section on f. 99r-99v. Another folio was lost after f. 141 and the same other hand supplied the missing section, i.e., the end of Pseudo-Ptolemy’s De cometis (B.4) and Dixerunt Ptholomeus et Hermes (B.5) on f. 100r (see below). A few marginal notes by the scribe. Substantial marginal notes in another hand f. 124r. |
|---|---|
|
141va-141vb, 100r
|
‘Ptolomeus in hoc loco tricas et tricarum nomina posuit… (141vb) Stelle cum caudis sunt 9… ad modum argenti (100r) purissimi quod non potest — in regibus et divitibus apparebit. Et hec de cometis breviter distinximus.’ = Pseudo-Ptolemy, De cometis (B.4)
, as part of the Centiloquium (see above). No glosses. |
|
100r
|
‘Nunc de conceptus et nativitatis hora dicendum est. Dixerunt Ptholomeus et Hermes quod Lune locus in hora qua — et hoc expertus fuit multotiens. Sic faciunt ascendentem secundum herum uranicum.’ = Pseudo-Ptolemy, Dixerunt Ptolemeus et Hermes quod locus Lune... (B.5)
, as part of the Centiloquium (see above). No glosses. |