Work C.1.21
Johannes Regiomontanus
Epitome Almagesti
This summary of the Almagest was begun by Georg Peurbach in 1460 or 1461 at the request of Cardinal Bessarion, who sought to replace George of Trebizond’s deficient translation and commentary (C.1.19). But Peurbach died unexpectedly in April 1461, as he was half-way through, and the work was continued by his student and associate Johannes Regiomontanus (1436-1476), who completed it in 1461 or 1462. Besides the Almagest, based on Gerard of Cremona’s translation (A.1.2), Peurbach and Regiomontanus made extensive use of Geber’s Liber super Almagesti (C.1.2), the Almagesti minor (C.1.4) and Albategni’s [al-Battānī] De scientia astrorum. For further works by Regiomontanus on the Almagest, see C.1.22, C.1.23. The Epitome Almagesti was used by the anonymous author of the Liber Almagesti Ptholomei abbreviatus (C.1.24).
Text ‘(Venice, BNM, Fondo antico lat. Z. 328) (1r-2r) [
Bibl. J.-B.-J. Delambre, Histoire de l’astronomie du Moyen Age, Paris, 1819, 284-288; E. Rosen, ‘Regiomontanus’ Breviarium’, Medievalia et Humanistica 15 (1963), 95-96; N. M. Swerdlow, ‘The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’s Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117 (1973), 423-512: 425-426; N. W. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer, Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De revolutionibus, New York, 1984, I, 50-52; E. Zinner, Regiomontanus: His Life and Work, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford-Tokyo, 1990 (tr. with additions of Leben und Wirken des Joh. Müller von Königsberg, genannt Regiomontanus, Osnabrück, 1968), 51-55 and 213-214; A. Rigo, ‘Bessarione, Giovanni, Regiomontano e i loro studi su Tolomeo a Venezia e Roma (1462-1464)’, Studi Veneziani, N. S. 21 (1991), 49-110: 77-92; A. Rigo, ‘Gli interessi astronomici del cardinal Bessarione’, in Bessarione e l’Umanesimo. Catalogo della mostra, eds G. Fiaccadori, A. Cuna, A. Gatti, S. Ricci, Napoli, 1994, 105-117: 109-113; M. Shank, ‘Regiomontanus and Homocentric Astronomy’, Journal for the History of Astronomy 29 (1998), 157-166; M. Shank, ‘Regiomontanus on Ptolemy, Physical Orbs, and Astronomical Fictionalism: Goldsteinian Themes in the “Defense of Theon against George of Trebizond”’, Perspectives on Science 10 (2002), 179-207; J. S. Byrne, The Stars, the Moon, and the Shadowed Earth: Viennese Astronomy in the Fifteenth Century, PhD dissertation, Princeton University, 2007, 156-167; M. Shank, ‘Regiomontanus as a Physical Astronomer: Samplings from The Defence of Theon against George of Trebizond’, Journal for the History of Astronomy 38 (2007), 325-349; M. Malpangotto, Regiomontano e il rinnovamento del sapere matematico e astronomico nel Quattrocento, Bari, 2008, 33-36; H. Zepeda, The Medieval Latin Transmission of the Menelaus Theorem, PhD dissertation, University of Oklahoma at Norman, 2013, 334-339; M. Shank, ‘Regiomontanus and Astronomical Controversy in the Background of Copernicus’ in Before Copernicus. The Culture and Contexts of Scientific Learning in the Fifteenth Century, eds R. Feldhay, F. J. Ragep, Montreal-London-Chicago, 2017, 79-109: 87-92; M. Shank, ‘The Almagest, Politics, and Apocalypticism in the Conflict between George of Trebizond and Cardinal Bessarion’, Almagest 8 (2017), 49-83: 56-57; H. Zepeda, The First Latin Treatise on Ptolemy’s Astronomy: The Almagesti minor (c. 1200), Turnhout, 2018, 109-114; M. Shank, ‘Regiomontanus versus George of Trebizond on Planetary Order, Distances, and Orbs (Almagest 9.1)’, in Ptolemy’s Science of the Stars in the Middle Ages, eds D. Juste, B. van Dalen, D. N. Hasse, C. Burnett, Turnhout, 2020, 305-386; M. Malpangotto, Theoricae novae planetarum Georgii Peurbacii dans l’histoire de l’astronomie, Paris, 2021, 33-34 and 38.
Modern ed. None, but there is a facsimile of ed. Venice 1496 in F. Schmeidler, Joannis Regiomontani opera collectanea. Faksimiledrucke von neun Schriften Regiomontans und einer von ihm gedruckten Schrift seines Lehrers Purbach, Osnabrück, 1972, 55-274.
EDS |
|
---|---|
MSS |